Monday, March 31, 2014

US Muppets' show

DIE HARD III / Herman Tiu Laurel / February 10, 2014


Immediately after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe spoke at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Jan. 22, 2014, the international media exploded with reports of Abe likening the present year, 2014, to the eve of World War I in 1914. He was further reported to have compared China to Nazi Germany and Japan to England.

The Chinese response, summed up in a high-level statement from China’s National People’s Congress Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Fu Ying at the Munich Security Conference last Feb. 1, declared: “Now is the era of peace and development… the ‘Chinese dream’ can’t be realized without a good external environment... the ‘Chinese dream’ will add to peace and prosperity of... the world.”

Two weeks after Abe’s reported comparisons, the Japanese foreign ministry announced on Feb. 3 to Japanese media Asahi and Sankei Shimbun(s) that PM Abe’s controversial remarks were “embellished” by “an employee” of the “private interpretation firm.”

A translation from the chief cabinet secretary Yoshihide Suga shows Abe being asked about a possible Japan-China conflict, where Abe replied: “This year marks the 100th year since World War I.  At the time, Britain and Germany had a strong economic relationship, but they went to war… If something like you suggest were to happen, it would cause serious losses to both Japan and China... We must ensure this will not happen.”

Despite this clarification from the Japanese government about the erroneous translation, BS Aquino in an interview with the New York Times echoed the false Abe comparisons and called on world leaders not to err in appeasing China over the China Sea issues, saying, “Well, the world has to say it… Remember that the Sudetenland was given in an attempt to appease Hitler to prevent World War II...”

China’s state news agency, Xinhua, thus branded Aquino as a “disgrace,” noting how he had “exposed his true colors as an amateurish politician who was ignorant both of history and reality.”

History-on-the-Net writes, “The Sudetenland was taken away from Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire and given to Czechoslovakia… Although American President Woodrow Wilson had wanted people in disputed regions to be allowed to decide where they would live this did not happen.”

Sudetenland was first “taken away,” with its German population severely discriminated against, before it was “given back” in the alleged “appeasement” prior to WWII.

The Palace Idiot thus stepped into the very complex labyrinth of WWII history where even angels dread to tread. While Japan was able to correct the mistranslation of Abe’s remarks, there is now absolutely nothing that MalacaƱang can do to remedy Aquino’s gross ignorance.

Since US President Barack Obama announced in November 2011 the US “pivot” to Asia, i.e. the US’ programmed deployment of 60 percent of its military assets to the region by 2020, there has been a steady stream of tension and disinformation in relation to the China Sea issues, particularly between China on one side and Japan and the Philippines on the other.

The Philippines raised tensions with China in April 2012 when it attempted to arrest — despite the long-held tradition of “coexistence” between seafarers — Chinese fishing boats in the Scarborough (a.k.a. Ayungin) Shoal claimed by both countries, resulting in a prolonged standoff between Philippine naval (grey) and several Chinese maritime surveillance ships.

This was followed by outbursts of Chinese emotions when the Japanese government officially announced in September 2012 its purchase of the Diaoyu Islands from private Japanese hands, effectively nationalizing them, and unavoidably drawing in official Chinese government counteraction.

Following that, in September 2013, the Philippine Secretary of National Defense accused China of setting up 75 concrete blocks to construct a new base at the Scarborough Shoal, only to retract it a month later (October) when the Philippine government, amid much embarrassment, was forced to admit that these were actually US target practice anchors.

And soon after, Japanese PM Abe made that infamous visit to the Yasukuni shrine infested by known Japanese war criminals, which again provoked furor from neighboring countries.

On Jan. 10, 2014, to China’s surprise, its 30-year old fishing rules burst into a front page issue when Washington labeled them “provocative and potentially dangerous,” to which China replied: “For more than 30 years, China’s relevant fisheries laws and regulations… have never caused any tension… If someone feels the need to say that technical amendments… pose a threat to regional stability… then it must be due to an ulterior motive.”

Then, by mid-January, news spread like wildfire in Philippine and Western media that “China will invade Pagasa Island in 2014,” which a few days later the Philippine Foreign Affairs Department and presidential spokesman denied as having had any basis at all.

Who could forget China’s announcement of its Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) that was attended by the US and Japan’s virulent objections, when both had already imposed their own ADIZs way back in the 1960s, with Japan’s overlapping parts of China’s Exclusive Economic Zone and with China actually being the last country in East Asia to have implemented this.

But before clarification could be absorbed by the world audience, Japan quickly accused China on Feb. 2 of planning an ADIZ over the entire China Sea, a falsehood China emphatically denied two days later.
Strangely, after months of black propaganda against China, US Pacific Command chief Admiral Samuel Locklear, stated on Feb. 5: “China (is) ‘acting professionally’ in (its) air defense zone.”

Through it all, Japanese and Philippine political leaders seem to be staging a continuous, scripted show to create anti-China scandals that have no basis in reality.  They may not notice it yet but they are looking and sounding more and more like dumbassed “muppets” in a geopolitical media show.

(Watch GNN’s Talk News TV with HTL on Destiny Cable Channel 8, SkyCable Channel 213, and www.gnntv-asia.com, Saturday, 8:00 p.m. and replay Sunday, 8 a.m.; tune in to “Sulo ng Pilipino” on 1098 AM, Tuesday to Friday, 5 p.m.; visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com; e-mail me at htlnow@fastmail.fm; and text reactions to 0917-8658664)

RP media suckered to war

DIE HARD III / Herman Tiu Laurel / February 12, 2014


Philippine media reports and opinions, including those of netizens, are turning reality on its head as to who the real bully is in Asia, by deliberately focusing the spotlight on China when it is the US that has been throwing its weight around in the region since 1945.

General Curtis LeMay, planner of the strategic bombing of North Korea, said, “After destroying North Korea’s 78 cities and thousands of her villages... over a period of three years or so, we killed off — what — 20 percent of the population.” (Actually, it’s 30 percent.)

Then, further south, aside from four million Vietnamese civilian deaths are “two million Agent Orange victims (where) the figure today is greater than 3 million… including children of the second and third generations.” (Vietnam Agent Orange Relief and Responsibility Campaign, US)

In the Philippines, apart from the US’ war atrocities at the turn of the 20th Century, the colonial power is leading the merciless financial and economic extractions behind the dictated hemorrhagic debt and expanded Value Added Tax, electricity privatization, blockade of cheaper Chinese infrastructure goods (like MRT coaches), ad nausea.

The public needs accurate information, such as those coming from James Cogan (“US Analysts Debate Plans for War Against China,” GlobalResearch), who wrote: “Seth Cropsey of the Hudson Institute... told a US Senate subcommittee… ‘With China, our objective ought to be to prevent the rise of an Asian hegemony, a power that would destroy the current US alliance system in Asia (And) the alternative being advocated is by Thomas Hammes.

“Hammes, a former marine colonel... published several articles... promoting his ‘Offshore Control’ plan… in 2012 that the US repudiate direct attacks on targets located on the Chinese mainland... preparing for an economic blockade of China, which is included within AirSea Battle (the US war doctrine now) that the US military instead ‘cripple China’s export trade...’ (by) sinking or intercepting and turning back vessels (or) what in peacetime would be piracy on a mass scale. He noted that ‘80 percent of China’s imported oil transits the Straits of Malacca. If Malacca, Lombok, Sunda, and the routes north and south of Australia were controlled, these shipments could be cut off’, causing a massive energy crisis.”

As I have quoted the official Chinese declaration last Feb. 1 at the Munich Security Conference in my last column about the “Chinese dream” being realized with “a good external environment,” thereby adding to global “peace and prosperity,” the Philippines would indeed benefit from this.

Instead, fear and loathing of the Chinese are being inflamed as the specter of a “threat” is raised. But a “threat” to what?
The Philippines’ gold and other mineral treasures have been sucked dry by the US and its allies over the past hundred years. That is what the West does not want to lose.

China is aware of the eventual “economic blockade,” hence, it is investing in commercial ports in Pakistan (Gwadar), Sri Lanka (Hambantota and Colombo), Bangladesh (Chittagong), and Myanmar (Sittwe and Kyaukpyu). There is also a proposed project to open up the isthmus of Thailand (like the Panama Canal) to be known as the Kra Canal. All these are aimed at obviating the passage of Chinese goods around the Straits of Malacca and avoiding any choke-off of trade to and from China. South Asia and Southeast Asian trade will flourish because of these ports; only the West’s strategic interests are threatened.

China basher Ashley Townshend in YaleGlobal Online, for instance, opined, “Viewed alongside the large-scale naval modernization program being undertaken by the People’s Liberation Army Navy many worry that these ostensibly trade-oriented ports will one day be upgraded into permanent naval bases.”

But why should China do as they fear if others do not attempt to sabotage it and the region’s economic prosperity? The fact is, the US and its Western allies continue to discuss plots to choke off China as cited above.

And why would the US and the West want to start a war? From “All Wars Are Bankers’ Wars” by Michael Rivero: “The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III’s Currency Act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England… World War I started between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, but quickly shifted to focus on Germany… seen as an economic threat to Great Britain… When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it opened the door for (the state) to issue (its) own state currency not borrowed from private central bankers. Freed from having to pay interest… Germany blossomed and quickly began to rebuild its industry...”

British wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill once said, “The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.” (Fulton, USA speech, March 1946)

Suck on that, pro-US idiots!

(Watch GNN’s Talk News TV with HTL on Destiny Cable Channel 8, SkyCable Channel 213, and www.gnntv-asia.com, Saturday, 8:00 p.m. and replay Sunday, 8 a.m.; tune in to “Sulo ng Pilipino” on 1098 AM, Tuesday to Friday, 5 p.m.; visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com; and text reactions to 0917-8658664)

Germany, Japan militarizing

DIE HARD III / Herman Tiu Laurel / February 5, 2014


At the recent Davos World Economic Forum Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe used his speech to foment disinformation, likening rising tensions between Japan and China to relations of Germany as a rising power against the United Kingdom 100 years ago.

Foreign Affairs Committee of China’s National People’s Congress chairman Fu Ying while attending a session of the Munich Security Conference last Feb. 1, responded saying “Now is the era of peace and development… the ‘Chinese dream’ can’t be realized without a good external environment and in return the ‘Chinese dream’ will add to peace and prosperity of the region and the world.”

China’s Ambassador Fu Ying, assigned to Manila in the late 90s and who pointed out then the National Bookstore sold maps of the Republic of the Philippines (based on government maps) that did not include the now dubbed “West Philippines Sea,” is indeed correct that 2014 has no comparison to 1914 as today is the Era of Globalization that has set down the rules of international trade to obviate the use of force in economic and trade relations; i.e. to paraphrase the late British leader, “To jaw-jaw and not war-war” on economic and trade issues. 

However, there are similarities between England and Japan as financial and economic crisis beset them then and now. Prof. Richard Roberts, of King’s College London, and author of Saving the City — the Great Financial Crisis of 1914, writes, “It was the most serious systemic financial crisis that has ever overtaken Britain — or indeed the world. There were something like 50 countries which had stock exchange crashes and runs on banks.” 

Behind the scenes the global bankers manipulating the financial crash of that time prepared to push the world into war as they have done since the Napoleonic Wars, for untold profits. 

Mujahid Kamran writing in the Nation last April 2012 quotes F. William Engdahl from his book “A Century of War:”
“By 1920, Morgan’s partner, Thomas W. Lamont, noted with obvious satisfaction that, ‘as a result of four years of war and global devastation, the national debts of the world have increased by $210,000,000,000 or about 475 percent in the last six years, and as a natural consequence, the variety of government bonds and the number of investors in them have been greatly multiplied... but nowhere, perhaps, in greater measure than in the United States’.” The past decade that led to the 2008 Financial Crash, the Western global bankers find themselves in the same crisis-and-opportunity moment as 1914 at the turn of the 20th Century.

Japan’s right wing ultra-patriots, with assistance from the US “pivot to Asia” started the drum roll with the Japanese government purchase of the Diaoyu Islands in September 2012 from private owners effectively “nationalizing” the issue and giving the Chinese government no choice but to officially act on the provocation. 

It is vital and fundamental to keep this timeline in mind to keep the proper and just perspective on this. Provocations after provocations followed, leading to Abe’s visit to the War Memorial, Yasukuni Shrine and now at Davos this misinterpretation of World History is made to conform to the war-mongers’ perspective.

On Europe, Stefan Steinberg reports in “Germany, US Push Aggressive Policies at Munich Security Conference (MSC)” appearing in Global Research and the World Socialist Web site:

“The MSC featured a series of speeches by top German officials announcing an aggressive military policy, effectively repudiating the traditional restraints on German militarism that have existed since the collapse of the Nazi regime at the end of World War II... (the tone) laid down by the former East German pastor and current president of Germany, Joachim Gauck... Called for the country’s armed forces to be used more frequently and decisively…”

The US of course has long put pressure on Russia’s western front with missile defense system being deployed in East European countries on the ridiculous excuse that they are to defend against Iranian missiles. A few days ago the US added another provocation, the deployment of ballistic missile defense destroyer USS Donald Cook to Spain to add to Nato’s “anti-missile,” “shield” (of spear) that reaches Russia territory.

US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, a former anti-war activist, said this is “An important posture enhancement is European missile defense in response to ballistic missile threats from Iran,” of course Iran has missiles that can only reach the Gulf region and Israel.

Russia may consider withdrawing from Strategic Arms Reduction if the US continues boosting its anti-missile systems in Europe. Like China, Russia’s economy is looking up and sees no benefit in conflict. 

It is the US, Nato and their puppets aching for conflict to save their economies. The People of the World must not be lured into the trap.” 

(Watch GNN’s TNT with HTL, “R.P. Fried by Rice Smuggling” on Chanel 8 Destiny Cable and Chanel 213 SkyCable, Sat. 8 p.m. and Sun. 8 a.m.; tune to 1098AM, DWAD, Tues. to Fri. 5 p.m to 6 p.m. “Sulo ng Pilipino;” e-mail at htlnow@fastmail.fm; login to www.newkatipunan.blogspot.com)