Herman Tiu Laurel
9/17/2012
We should have expected it, another "shock and awe" event on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 World Trade Center terror moment. There were speculations about another "Pearl Harbor" moment being plotted by architects of the global "Clash of Civilizations). These plotter reap the boon from the wars raging today, but the expected special ops were expected to be on the scale of the 9/11 WTC. It was speculated that the next 9/11 shock and awe could be a biological weapon attack on Europe. What happened in this second decade anniversary of 9/11 is a coordinated provocation via YouTube and a murderous assault on the US Embassy in Benghazi by a "small and savage group" killing US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other US personnel which according to Hillary Clinton was perpetrated by a "small and savage group."
There is credible basis for asserting that the Benghazi US Embassy attack was a planned and coordinated operation. From a dozen Internet sources some facts: American pastor Terry Jones, a Quran burning campaigner, had a live stream on Sept. 11 on the internet where he showed the 13-minute promotional clip of the blasphemous film the Innocence of Muslims purportedly directed by an American Jew called Sam Bacile for the alleged $5-million budget film donated by 100 Jews. It is believed Sam Bacile does not really exist. The actors and actresses in the film deny that they knew their project was about Muhammad, and the name was only later dubbed in. From the news site Press TV comes this, "That a blasphemous movie desecrating the person of the holy Prophet of Islam has been released in the United States simultaneously with the 9/11 tragic incident cannot be looked upon as sheer coincidence."
On the evening of pastor Terry Jones' Internet release of Innocence of Muslims on the Internet the Benghazi US Embassy attack happened. Reuters reports, "the militants had surprisingly precise intelligence about the whereabouts of a safe house where the ambassador was rushed after the clashes started. While luck clearly played a role — Stevens died of asphyxiation." This report of death by asphyxiation is now being questioned. Victor Kotsev of Asia Times writes and quotes, "it was clearly professionally executed. 'This was a well-armed, well-coordinated event,' the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee of the US Congress, Mike Rogers, told MSNBC. 'It had both indirect and direct fire, and it had military maneuvers that were all part of this very organized attack.'" Then there's that simultaneous attack in Egypt, indication of a much wider plot.
Kotsev continues, "The British think-tank Quilliam reports that the assault consisted of two waves and was carried out by around 20 militants seeking to avenge the death of al-Qaeda's second in command, Abu Yahya who was assassinated in June." Gordon Duff of Veterans Today Military and Foreign Affairs Journal writes of their intelligence on the ground, "The killings of the diplomats were done under the cover of the riots which had been orchestrated in advance over a series of days. Four color printed placards were ready to distribute prior to the Jones 'stream-cast'… The actual killings are said to have been done by a team of newly trained Special Forces from the United Arab Emirates working directly in conjunction with the Mossad. Crowds were being managed by French DGSE agents, seen by the dozen, and British security service personnel were present but their role was not clear."
The Libyan government blames Kadhafi loyalists for the killing of Ambassador Stevens, an indication that he may not have died of asphyxiation. That contradicts the British think tank Quilliam suggestion that al-Qaeda did it citing a video Internet release of its chief Ayman al-Zawahiri, 24 hours before the embassy attack, to avenge US assassination of Abu Yahya. But how could al-Zawahiri coordinate the pastor Terry Jones video-streaming? Whom to believe? We follow the questions: Who benefits and has the means to carry out such an operation? Obama is a big loser, its Libyan adventure in retrospect can now be blamed. The World is a loser as instability has increased. Could Israel be happier with Obama hurt and the Arab-US relations worsen? Obama's been foot dragging on the attack on Iran, while the Arab Spring countries like Egypt have turned to policies more favorable to Palestinians.
Does Israel have the means? Gordon Duff, a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, consultant in international banking, counter insurgency, surveillance technologies, intelligence, defense technologies, and for the UN, writes: "Netanyahu and his US affiliates carefully orchestrated these terror acts with supporters of the Romney camp including the 'donors' responsible for the production of the original film; CIA cooperation in an attack on American diplomats was arranged through Bush era intermediaries who manage contractor firms that are now tasked with all CIA 'black ops'; Netanyahu has been further emotionally destabilized by nearly violent confrontations with US Chief of Staff Martin Dempsey and US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro, a close friend of President Obama's." Why kill the US ambassador? Would there be any impact without such a blood sacrifice?
