Things fall apart

DIE HARD III / Herman Tiu Laurel / 7/22/2013 / Daily Tribune

As I think of the State of the Nation address (Sona) day, the title of the first novel by an African writer I read some decades ago came to mind.
"Things Fall apart" by Chinua Achebe, the writer Africa believes is the Nobel Prize for Literature awardee that could never be due to Western colonialist fears of the truth. It's an entirely different setting and theme from what this column is about but the title is most appropriate for the state of things in the Philippines under the present regime and all the past 25 years after the establishment of the Yellow dynasty in the Philippines. The economy, the moral structure of society, the educational system, its politics, the foreign relations of the country, its territory, they are all falling apart and in shambles.

Before I proceed on to the Sona, there's an SOS from friends of new Bureau of Immigration OIC commissioner Siegfried Mison who has been the subject of media bombardment instigated by immigration BI employees.

I first heard the harangues on dzMM, then read some in newspapers. The issue is "padding" of fuel use during an earlier stint there, which reports say Mison had been reprimanded for already. I had the same experience as a neophyte government official in my time at the refugee center. It's a slip up, a minor infraction. To size up the problem I called up former immigration chief Bono Adaza. Bono lambasted the endemic corruption among many BI career employees, saying any clean-up will be met with brickbats. BI ne'er-do-wells may be fearing Mison. Last February, the Ombudsman ordered 45 BI employees sacked and 48 disciplined.

The Sona this year will be no different from all previous ones since Cory Aquino's first in 1987. It'll be the usual cover-ups of the destructive consequence the Yellow forces "reforms" that have wrought on the nation's governance, and socio-economic and political infrastructure. The Yellow's rule was paved by the intrusion of the US State Department in collaboration with the traditional oligarchy, primarily with the Makati Business Club, the Catholic hierarchy, many Western nurtured NGOs and "leftists," opportunist political opposition groups and band-wagoned Metro-Manila middle class and masa. Marcos had a program to build a nation, the Yellows had the program to profit and transfer such to foreign and local corporations of which they had interlocking ownership.

The only post-1987 Sona that spoke the truth was President Joseph Estrada's 1998 Sona where he declared the well-known fact that the Philippine economy was: Bangkarote (bankrupt). Two years later he was deposed for his incorrigible truth-telling and actions to resolve real problems. He prioritized restoration of peace and order and focused on trouncing the MILF, but that would have scuttled US plans to have a surrogate state in Mindanao. The Yellow crowd helped the US depose Estrada. Truth-telling and taking forceful action do not pay in Philippines politics. To be successful in Philippine national politics, one needs to feign belief in the country's sovereignty and democracy.

Today's Sona will be again an exercise in hypocrisy. Not just for BS Aquino III but for almost all members of Congress, the Senate, Malacañang and its Cabinet. Among media, mainstream broadcast media reporters on site, in Congress, will be the most pressured to put on the best act, pretending something important is going on by describing the flashiest wears of the solons and counting the numbers of applause to what is regularly a boring speech full of data twisting and outright lying on the state-of-the-nation; lies about government uplifting the poor and hungry, stimulating economic "growth," campaigns against corruption, ad nausea, all to divert from the latest, brazen police rubout and the crackle of "chi-chacha-ron" of pork and charter change for the benefit of foreign interests.

The true state of the nation can be summed up in the most scandalous news report of a Czech ambassador threatening to speak on a $ 30-million extortion try on the Czech company Inekon Trams on an MRT coaches supply deal. It dragged in Ballsy Aquino and hubby Eldon Cruz, as well as Cory Aquino DoTC secretary Pete Prado. After a week on the brink Malacañang with whatever backroom maneuvers got the Czech ambassador Josef Rychtar to salvage Ballsay, Eldon and First family's reputation by shifting blame to DoTC officials in general and throwing in an outright lie that "a government-to-government contracts do not allow commissions" while the world knows it is such deals that provide the largest under-the-table commissions.

There's a litany of crises that is hanging in the air crying out to be resolved, but all of which will be glossed over by BS Aquino III's Sona: hunger and joblessness grows, 20,000 OFWs in Taiwan in peril of losing jobs, two police rub-outs unresolved (Atimonan and Cavite), Philippine territories carved out by MILF, economic losses in the China stand-off, automation f—ked democracy, utility costs and taxes skyrocketing, ad infinitum.

Things have fallen apart more than we can imagine.

(Tune to 1098 AM, 5 to 6 p.m., Tuesday to Friday; Destiny Cable, Channel 8, Saturday 8 p.m. and Sunday 8 a.m.: "OFWs await RP-Taiwan conciliation"; visit: http//www.newkatipunero.blogspot.com; text comments to 0923-4095739)

On the First Family’s ‘integrity’

DIE HARD III / Herman Tiu Laurel / 7/15/2013 / Daily Tribune

Since the corruption story about the First Family came out, there has been a tremendous public relations effort to put out the fires of speculation around it. The First Family is, of course, the bachelor BS Aquino III, his sisters, and his brothers-in-law. The speculation involves an alleged "advance" from Czech company Inekon to a group led by presidential brother-in-law Eldon Cruz, whose wife is Ballsy Aquino (the most Cory Aquino look-alike of the four sisters), apparently in exchange for a contract to supply light-railway train coaches to the Metro Rail Transit Corp.
The source of the speculation was an AM radio report citing unnamed informants. Subsequently, radio station dzRH reported that a Czech Republic representative to the Philippines was readying to spit out the details.
Malacañang doused the fires with every resource in its command, including media assets such this newspaper publisher who represents the kind of media that would defend today's First Family. But let me get right to the point of this piece: We do not even need the present Inekon controversy to know the true nature of the Aquino-Cojuangco family and its entire political clan.

One only needs to look at the prime example of the corrupt character of the family: The history of one of its prized family jewels, Hacienda Luisita, a piece of around 6,500 hectares of land bigger than the cities of Makati and Pasay combined, finagled through political connections and funded by public funds, which the family refused to return to the farmers as stipulated in the original agreement.
What the Aquino-Cojuangcos did in the Hacienda Luisita deal, however, is not unique to them. It is the trademark of the prevailing ruling class that "owns" the country. By "ruling class," we do not refer simply to "the rich" but "the rich intertwined with the politics and foreign relations of this country." They are the ones who really make the decisions and are responsible for deposing our elected leaders. The Edsa II coup against Erap Estrada, for instance, had to have the imprimatur of Cory Aquino, in much the same way that Estrada's "redemption" years later had to be lent some added weight by that Yellow figurehead's apology.
Speaking of that episode in our history, what were the real motives of much of the Aquino-Cojuangcos in eventually going against Gloria Arroyo? Was it not Gloria's countermove post-Hyatt 10 of refusing to extend the Hacienda Luisita "behest" lease? Was it not the same in the case of BS Aquino's "conviction" of former Chief Justice Renato Corona?

A very explicit example of how the "immaculate" clan members go about their unobtrusive operations is the case of the PLDT telecommunications gateway during the time of Cory Aquino. We have as witness a bona fide but rebellious and socialist-minded former National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) insider Linggoy Alcuaz, who is sometimes dubbed by cousins as a "traitor to his own class," knowing that he tried to break the PLDT monopoly of the international gateway at that time, in the mid-80s.

For his anti-Marcos activism, Alcuaz was appointed NTC commissioner. Knowing how he can be bullheaded and independent, the Aquinos made sure they had control of the two deputy commissioners, such that each of them was recommended by sons-in-law Eldon Cruz and Manolo Abeleda. When Alcuaz signed the additional gateways to two PLDT competitors, the deputy commissioner recommended by Eldon Cruz ran to him trembling and pleading, "Eldon called. What am I to do?" to which he said that that he had the sole responsibility. Alcuaz was eventually fired by Cory Aquino, though he contends that it was because of a coup prediction he made. Others, though, believe it was really because of that PLDT gateway issue. Having said that, influence peddling is still the least of the crimes of the clan.

Historical evidence of the Aquino-Cojuangcos' crony and bureaucrat capitalism, as well as obsequious allegiance to predatory powers for their self-aggrandizement, is outstanding. Many Filipinos now know of Doña Isidra Cojuangco and the missing revolutionary treasury of the Katipunan. The Aquino-Cojuangcos' defense, cited in one account, is that they were "aided by free rail transport to Manila markets from their rice mill in Paniqui (the commercial rate at that time being P2.50 per sack), as a gift from General Arthur MacArthur, whom they assisted with accommodation and storage space during the American advance." The problem is, "in this period rice production in Tarlac was hampered not only by war, but also by severe floods and locust plagues." Thus, "it is difficult to see how this… two-hectare property and small rice mill in 1896… (grew to become) 2,000 hectares along the rail line by 1901."

After abandoning the Philippine Revolution in favor of American colonizers, the Aquino-Cojuangcos were just as quick to join the Japanese Imperial forces, serving as political props for the new occupying powers. Grandfather Benigno Simeon Aquino Sr. served as head of parliament of the puppet government while grandmother Aurora Aquino led its women's bureau. How much did they profit then? Honestly, isn't this claimed extortion possible that the Czechs reportedly allege today? Hell, yeah!

(Tune in to 1098 AM, Tuesday to Friday, 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.; watch GNN Destiny Cable Channel 8, Saturday, 8 p.m. and replay Sunday, 8 a.m., this week on "China, RP, and US hegemonism"; visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com; and text reactions to 0923-4095739)

Taking RP and Filipinos for saps?

DIE HARD III / Herman Tiu Laurel / 7/10/2013 / Daily Tribune

For over a week now, a Reuters report on China's supposed threat of a "counterstrike" has riled and wildly agitated Philippine media and officialdom. Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) Secretary Albert del Rosario was quoted as having branded the alleged "official" statement as "irresponsible." Countless media commentators, including "military experts" and "diplomats" — from BusinessWorld's Rafael Alunan to Manila Standard Today's Ambassador Alejandro del Rosario — lambasted the supposed counterstrike threat. I hope they had watched Global News Network (GNN)'s Sunday show with Kit Tatad that featured his interview with the premier China expert in the Philippines, Chito Sta. Romana, where the latter revealed Reuters' error in translation. We would love to give them copies just so that they'd sober up.
Chito sent us a comparison of the Chinese characters used by Reuters and the exact words used in the opinion piece in the People's Daily. I don't know if Tribune's printing press is able to print these characters so I'll also supply the phonetics. According to Chito, the "Chinese characters used in the original article are those which means "counter-measures" (pronounced "fanzhi"). Somehow it got translated by the international media as "counter-strike," which is (pronounced "fanji").
I read the Reuters article with the "counter-strike" translation, which was carried by our media. Here is the link to the Chinese article on "counter-measures": http://world.people.com.cn/n/2013/0629/c1002-22014733.html. "Fanzhi" can be found in the second line of the last paragraph."
Did the erroneous Reuters translation intend to take the Philippines (and Filipinos) for a wild ride on anti-China vituperations? We'll never know that for sure; but clearly, many of our so-called "intelligentsia" had been too easily aroused to rabid anti-China and war-mongering sentiments.

These Filipino pundits are perhaps only too eager to show their abiding obedience to the unspoken desires of the traditional Western masters of this land that ever since they read between the lines of Obama's "pivot to Asia," they've been falling all over each other to outdo the US hawks in portraying China as "the bully" and the new "hegemon." Yet no matter how much they can be reasonably excused for their rabble rousing (if not utter stupidity), for the DFA to be caught in such a wrong-footed interpretation of the "counter-measure" reply is just sheer incompetence.
Indeed, the obsequiousness of these pundits and officials inevitably lead to their silliness. Take for instance this report, "Palace welcomes US diplomat's stance against China bullying."

Who was the "diplomat" in question and what the context in which he stated his opinion? Don't be surprised but the story was based on comments made during a US Senate confirmation hearing for the promotion of director for Asian Affairs Danny Russell to Assistant for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, both of which are actually very low posts in the totem pole of the US State Department. His comments were, however, made front page headlines by the local mainstream media.
Chito Sta. Romana observed that the Philippines may now be learning from its past errors of reacting too quickly and too frequently to very low level or even unofficial media, as well as academic opinions that do not reflect official Chinese policy. I guess he was being a bit too optimistic.

There is much disinformation from Western media that we must always sift through. Alunan, already erring in his "counterstrike" retort, even adds, "Despite China's atrocious ownership claims, no proof exists to back it up. From WikiLeaks, Cable 08BEIJING3499, sent to Washington by the US embassy in Beijing on Sept. 9, 2008, (it was) reported that a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) official… could not identify specific historical records to justify China's 'Nine Dashes' claim…"
But as far as the Chinese (Taiwan and People's Republic of China) side is concerned, it is pretty clear that "China's 1948 nine-dash line map shows the sea border… (and that) China's nine-dash line map was undisputed for 50 years from 1948 to 1998…"

So as the legal tit-for-tat continues, mutually beneficial bilateral talks are being blocked by a lone Asean minority and the real lone global hegemonist.
Unfortunately, the seemingly deliberate distortions in Philippine media about China are even bordering on the ridiculous. A column in Manila Standard Today entitled, "Why China needs a war," cited a slew of Chinese domestic concerns, such as an economy on a slump; exports facing hard times; communist rule in peril due to an educated young population; Tiananmen anniversary and "hate frenzy" diverted against Japan; Xinjiang troubles; widespread pollution; bird flu, etc., and that "instead of solving these problems," the writer claims that "China is busy building a mighty army and a blue water navy to bully its neighbors who are disputing its claim over the entire South China Sea."

But China has had the worst of these problems since 1949 and never had to resort to any major war as a solution. As for the other so-called problem — the slump in growth to seven percent — it is definitely a "problem" that other countries would dearly love to have.
China knows it needs a war like a hole in the head. It is actually the US that constantly starts many wars — this time provoking China — in order to thwart the rise of the erstwhile sleeping Dragon.

Some anti-China pundits are desperate to whip up more reasons to fire up Filipino xenophobia against the Chinese, apparently egged on by a Filipino-American woman who had a failed business in and a failed boycott campaign against the Asian superpower. Like the pro-Western Reuters news agency, this anti-Chinese bigot is also taking Filipinos for saps.

(Tune in to 1098 AM, Tuesday to Friday, 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.; watch GNN Destiny Cable Channel 8, Saturday, 8:00 p.m. and replay Sunday, 8 a.m., this week on "China, RP, and US hegemonism"; visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com; and text reactions to 0923-4095739)