Friday, August 24, 2012

Privatization Piracy Projects

PEOPLE'S STRUGGLE
Herman Tiu Laurel
8/20-26/2012



"There are those who intend that one day everything will be owned by somebody and we're not just talking goods here. We're talking human rights, human services, essential services for life. Education, public health, social assistance, pensions, housing. We're also talking about the survival of the planet. The areas that we believe must be maintained in the commons or under common control or we will collectively die." - Maude Victoria Barlow, National Chairperson of The Council of Canadians, co-founder of the Blue Planet Project, chair of Washington-based Food and Water Watch, founding member of the San Francisco–based International Forum on Globalization, former Senior Advisor on Water to the 63rd President of the U.N. General Assembly.

PPP schoolhouses – Private Piracy Project
A headline last Aug. 16 trumpeted: "PPP auction successful … for a second public-private partnership (PPP) project has been deemed a success by the government, which yesterday named two groups as the winners of contracts to build classrooms in three Luzon regions…. BF Corp.-Riverbanks Development Corp. and Citicore Investments Holdings, Inc.-Megawide Construction Corp., Inc. had successfully bid for the Public Private Partnership for School Infrastructure Project (PSIP). Build-lease-transfer contracts expected to be soon awarded involve the construction of 9,301 classrooms, with toilets and furniture, …" But, as our source at the very core of Philippine construction industry informs us and cannot be named as he represents one of the major suppliers to the sector, at a very huge cost to the Filipino people and the National Government:

"The PPP schoolhouses will cost P 1.2-M to construct based on the bid submissions of the winning contractors. If the schoolhouses were built by government it would cost P 700,000.00 only per unit of exactly the same design as the PPP proponents. The Filipino-Chinese business community donates similar schoolhouses as part of chambers of commerce outreach and public service programs, and they cost only P 300,000.00 per unit of exactly the same kind of schoolhouse. The National Government and the Filipino taxpayer will be severely burdened in the coming years paying massively over-priced schoolhouses and the private maintenance expenses will be added to this. It's going to be a mess in the coming years as the toilets and furniture breakdown and there will be constant bickering as to who should be responsible. There will be demands for escalation costs due to exchange rate fluctuations, inflation, and like electricity and water rates the schoolhouse maintenance cost will shoot up."

Like Electricity, a swindle of the Century
A new, double-edged blade of a survey from a foreign energy consultant rates Meralco's power rates as the World's "ninth most expensive". The Perth, Australia based International Energy Consultants (IEC) presentation at the Senate's Joint Congressional Power Commission (JCPC) also reported that the Philippines' power rates are still ranked the "highest power rate in Asia". The JCPC is tasked to oversee EPIRA (Electric Power Industry Reform Act) implementation to provide "least cost" power through "competition and efficiency", and chaired by Senator Serge Osmeña (a Lopez oligarchy-family relation and defender of the oligarchy, he chastised the conservative economic think tank FEF, Foundation for Economic Freedom, as "communists" for supporting the review of EPIRA). Filipinos and Mindanaoans, like labor advocate Louie Corrales, accuse Osmeña of stonewalling pro-people reforms in the JCPC.

The IEC survey named Hawaii, Italy, Malta, Japan, Cyprus, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands, Philippines and Singapore as having the highest power costs: "Meralco is comparable with Singapore, Australia, Netherlands and Denmark (the highest in the World - htl) but significantly higher than several other countries within the Asia-Pacific Region ,… In terms of commercial retail tariff, the Philippines ranked sixth among the 44 jurisdictions, with its $0.2043 per kilowatt hour (/kWh), exclusive of value added tax (VAT), 31% above the average among the 44 jurisdictions. The Philippines' $0.1728/kWh industrial retail tariff was also sixth highest and 26% above the average, while its $0.2485/kWh residential retail tariff was 17th highest and 13% above average." Note that Filipino residential consumers are subsidizing the local industrial sector paying 25% higher rates - and subsidizing private power companies who have never fully paid their privatization obligations to this day.

IEC's lead consultant and director John Morris said, "Several neighboring countries … have average tariffs that are much lower than Meralco's…due to … subsidies of up to 50% to consumers… IEC believes that providing subsidies via lower tariffs is bad economic practice and ultimately unsustainable. When subsidies are added back to retail tariffs, the true cost of electricity in these countries rises to a level that is much closer to Meralco's… " (a lie, Meralco rates are high because of massive overpricing of asset base and distorted Performance Base Rate –htl) - If the policy of subsidizing power is so bad why are all the countries Morris cites as practicing this "bad subsidy" all growing far faster economically than the Philippines? Common sense, Mr. Morris?, but I understand that IEC needs to make concessions to continue serving as consultant to many privatization projects.

IEC is no different from ERC and Meralco consultants Emmerton Consulting, SKM and NCL, providing conflicting data and signals to cover their asses while earning huge consultancy fees (as Butch Junia reports, the three costing up to P 500-M a year, charged to us Meralco customers).

Corpo-rats: unaccountable tyrants.
When I use the term corpo-rats it is not about the thousands of legitimate business enterprises that do business fairly and squarely. I refer to the privileged, power leveraged, foreign financed backed oligarchs like the Lopezes, Pangilinans, Cojuangcos et al, who combine and use manipulation of politics, financial maneuvering and corruption. Corpo-rats include the foreign trans-nationals exposed by John Perkins in his book "the Economic Hitman". We all know by now how bribery and IMF-World Bank pressure got the EPIRA passed in Congress in 2001, we all have learned over the years how the U.S. has been pressuring governments to open up their markets through globalization, and today, the complete privatization of public assets. Here're some words of wisdom from linguist, philosopher, social activist Noam Chomsky:

"Privatization does not mean you take a public institution and give it to some nice person. It means you take a public institution and give it to an unaccountable tyranny. Public institutions have many side benefits. For one thing they may purposely run at a loss. They're not out for profit. They may purposely run at a loss because of the side benefits. So, for example if a public steel industry runs at a loss it's providing cheap steel to other industries. Maybe that's a good thing. Public institutions can have a counter cyclic property. So that means that they can maintain employment in periods of recession, which increases demand, which helps you to get out of recession. Private companies can't do that in a recession. Throw out the work force because that's the way you make money."

The tyranny of the corpo-rats is highlighted in the case of Department of Energy chief Rene Almendras who was already announced by Malacañang months ago to be replaced by August 1 with a new face, Emmanuel Bonoan. Two weeks of August have passed and Almendras has not budged from the DoE. Why? If we follow the most crucial issues under the DoE we will see that the largest deal in the offing is the extension of the Malampaya natural gas contract which will negate the Philippine's 100% control over the multi-billion facility when the contract is supposed to expire in 2024. Shell and Chevron-Texaco want to abort this transfer of the assets to the Filipino people, and the man they trust to consummate it is Almendras; now not even Malacañang can make its decision to replace Almendras stick. In many aspects of our economy this is the helpless situation our government finds itself in. It is the same in the power industry where all sectors of the people now reject the EPIRA but cannot do anything about it.

Philippines must fight back
The privatization programs will go on endlessly until the Filipino as a nation and as a people have nothing left and all is under the control of a few oligarchs to drain the economy (as it was in Russia under Yeltsin) or until we as a people and led by an intelligent middle-class stand our ground and start fighting back. Many other countries shave done this, from Iceland which is now putting some of its parasitic bankers in prison for collaborating in privatizing state banks and swindling Iceland's savings depositors, to Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and many OTher Latin American countries who are taking back what is properly for the "commons" such as oil and other Mineral wealth, as well as power and water utilities, i.e. what is best shared amongst the people and the nation. This is the People's Struggle.

(Watch Destiny Cable GNN's HTL edition of Talk News TV, Saturdays, 8:15 to 9 p.m., with replay at 11:15 p.m. and Sunday, this week: "Politicization of the Judiciary" with Attys. Bono Adaza and Alan Paguia; visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com)

Monday, August 20, 2012

Meralco's 'subsidy' spin

DIE HARD III
Herman Tiu Laurel
8/20/2012



A new survey from a foreign energy consultant ranks Meralco's power rates as the World's "ninth most expensive". The Perth, Australia based International Energy Consultants (IEC) presentation at the Senate's Joint Congressional Power Commission (JCPC) also reported that the Philippines' power rates are still ranked the "highest power rate in Asia". The JCPC is tasked to oversee EPIRA (Electric Power Industry Reform Act) implementation to provide "least cost" power through "competition and efficiency", and chaired by Senator Serge Osmeña (who chastised the conservative economic think tank FEF, Foundation for Economic Freedom, as "communists" for supporting the review of EPIRA). Many Filipinos and Mindanaoans aware of or adept in the power sector issues, like labor advocate Louie Corrales or Mr. Jojo Borja of Iligan Light and Power (ILPI) or consumer advocates Butch Junia or Mang Naro Lualhati, believe Osmeña stonewalls real reforms.

The IEC named Hawaii, Italy, Malta, Japan, Cyprus, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands, Philippines and Singapore as having the highest power rates : "Meralco is comparable with Singapore, Australia, Netherlands and Denmark (the highest in the World - htl) but significantly higher than several other countries within the Asia-Pacific Region ,… In terms of commercial retail tariff, the Philippines ranked sixth among the 44 jurisdictions, with its $0.2043 per kilowatt hour (/kWh), exclusive of value added tax (VAT), 31% above the average among the 44 jurisdictions. The Philippines' $0.1728/kWh industrial retail tariff was also sixth highest and 26% above the average, while its $0.2485/kWh residential retail tariff was 17th highest and 13% above average." Note that Filipino residential consumers are subsidizing the local industrial sector paying 25% higher rates - and subsidizing private power companies who have never fully paid their privatization obligations to this day.

IEC's consultant John Morris said, "Several neighboring countries … have average tariffs that are much lower than Meralco's…due to … subsidies of up to 50% to consumers… IEC believes that providing subsidies via lower tariffs is bad economic practice and ultimately unsustainable. When subsidies are added back to retail tariffs, the true cost of electricity in these countries rises to a level that is much closer to Meralco's… " Mr. Morris' opinion attempts to justify Meralco's high rates, blame it on "subsidy" but on this he provides no basis for the claim. If the policy of subsidizing power is "bad economic practice and ultimately unsustainable" then why are all the Asian countries Morris cites as practicing this "bad subsidy" all growing far faster economically and their people live better lives than the Philippines? Likewise, government subsidy to a country's power sector in its various methods of generation is the predominant practice in the World. This is obvious when considering mega-projects like hydro-electric or nuclear energy project all over the World only governments can undertake.

IEC was also the consultant the Philippine chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI) quoted in its February 2011 meeting and reported in the media, the same report TUCP cited to back up its direct and written appeal to President Noynoy Aquino to act on bringing down power costs in the country which it said is causing investors to turn away and jobs lost. Many Filipino power consumer advocates have been reporting this fact even before IEC came out with its survey in October or 2010; but there is a new twist to its presentation of its survey adding its opinion on the matter of subsidies to the power sector that those who understand the power industry in the Philippines immediately recognize as blatant lies: 1) that Philippine and Meralco power rates are among the highest because of subsidy from government and 2) subsidy for electricity is bad of an economy.

Let us state it clearly and emphatically here, there is no government subsidy in the Philippines for its power sector. If any subsidy is being provided it is the power consumers providing it – advancing payments each year for four year regulatory periods to Meralco and other Distribution Utilities (DUs); WESM (Wholesale Electricity Spot Market) exorbitant premium rates for power purchases from selected IPPs (Independent Power Producers); consumers' payments to Meralco rates based on 500% to 900% overprice of transformers, sub-stations, electric poles and other assets, proven by Jojo Borja's documented testimonies; consumer payments to Meralco for the "regulatory liaison" amounting to P 2.2-B which Butch Junia exposes; the carry-on of Meralco non-power related assets such as the Rockwell real estate projects; the up to 17% Performance Based Rate (PBR) that ERC replaced the 12% RORB rate affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2003.

Filipino power consumers are also paying for the subsidies for the "Lifeline Rate" to those consuming below 99kWh/month, the "senior citizens" discount and the SPUG (Small Power Utilities Group) or the financially unviable electrification of rural communities. Government is not paying for any subsidy. Don't be fooled by the use of the term subsidy by Mr. Morris, Serge Osmeña and others like them. They make everyone assume "subsidy" is always from government and "freebee" to people. In the Philippines' privatized power, water and toll ways it is always the consumers and commuters who are paying the subsidy to privatized public enterprises – socialism and "freebees" for the capitalists from the people's capital. IEC is playing an insidious role, as foreign consultants of ERC and Meralco like Emmerton Consulting, SKM and NCL – obfuscating data and signals, mixing half truths, to cover their own asses while taking in huge consultancy fees and giving the ERC, Meralco, the privateers the smokescreen to arbitrarily "true up" or "fudge" information and manipulate the industry sector.

(Watch Destiny Cable GNN's HTL edition of Talk News TV, Saturdays, 8:15 to 9 p.m., with replay at 11:15 p.m. and Sunday, this week: "Politicization of the Judiciary" with Attys. Bono Adaza and Alan Paguia; visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com)

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Floods: Yellow legacy

DIE HARD III
Herman Tiu Laurel
8/17/2012



The Fourth Yellow government now under BS Aquino III (the first three being under Cory, FVR and Gloria) is pointing to every Juan, Pedro and Maria to blame for the floods.

If we were to listen to Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) Secretary Jesse Robredo, then it's 100,000 of them, mainly slum folk of Metro Manila, who constitute up to 60 percent of the metropolis' population today. That's easier said than done; not just in the matter of funding for their relocation.
The problem lies in the fact that the cheap labor for the service and industrial sectors of the economy concentrated in Metro Manila comes from the slum-dwellers. Who pick up the thousands of tons of garbage, for example? Who are the waiters in the restaurants; the kargadors in the markets; or the janitors in the supermarkets? But wait: They're not all there is to the slums, as a multitude of the metro's police force also live there. Thus, a major economic dislocation would be in the offing with this knee-jerk reaction of the fourth Yellow government.

The relocation of at least half-a-million impoverished Filipinos from the slums of the metropolis to even worse living conditions for lack of jobs is not necessarily an unwelcome thought for all. If I were with the New People's Army (NPA) and the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), probably the only viable force for the poor to hit back at a system that has been so cruel to them, I would quietly watch and not oppose this proposal to "ethnically cleanse" the homeless poor from Metro Manila.

The forced mass migration will count among the largest in human history, one that even Moses probably would not have imagined; and there would be no promised land for such a massive body of humanity taken away from their jobs.
For once, the "reaffirmists" of the CPP-NDF should cozy up to the "rejectionists" of Etta Rosales, Riza Hontiveros, Ronald Llamas, et.al and murmur into their ears, "That's the right thing to do."

The CPP-NDF can finally find a new base, not conforming to Mao's theory — but a base nevertheless — for recruiting and arming freshly angered dissident forces within striking distance of the center of power in this country.

I read one news report quoting Dennis Murphy, whom I got to know as a young activist under Fr. Jose Blanco, lamenting the fact that the poor are always blamed for the floods. Of course, I would also raise the question as to why they are poor and why there are so many of them when the economy is supposedly growing each year and even hitting 6.4 percent in the first quarter of the current one.
This space is too limited to list all the news of the supposed growth or of the astounding corporate profit spikes but I can list a few here: "Energy unit lifts SMC profits …posted a more than 50-percent rise in second quarter net income, driven by earnings from its energy businesses"; "EDC nets P5.7 billion in first half … Lopez-led Energy Development Corp. (EDC) … driven by electricity sales from subsidiaries First Gen Hydro Power Corp. and Green Core Geothermal Inc., which jumped 32 percent to P15 billion from P11.4 billion a year ago."
Whereas we used to get low cost power decades ago, these companies are now components of the highest power cost in Asia inflicted on the Philippine economy, which has resulted in our ever-growing poverty.

The perennial flood crisis facing the entire Filipino nation (not just Metro Manila) is a legacy of the historic counter-revolution in political and economic democracy that was in its nascent stage in the early 1980s and aborted by the Yellow elite-led and US-backed "color revolution."
Whatever the anti-Marcos Yellow forces say against Marcos, it cannot be disputed that his government was already making headway in its housing for the slums and job generation through intermediate industrialization, as well as the launching of the OCW (Overseas Contract Workers) deployment program.

The tenement housing programs in conjunction with the Pag-ibig Fund and other housing financing saw its birth under Marcos. The housing programs since Cory Aquino has been but a shadow of many a derelict Pag-ibig tenement projects.
It's pretty much the same experience the nation has had with the grand and far-seeing flood control programs of Marcos that has seen Cory and the Yellows all but throw these into the untended sewer systems of the country.

The perennial flood disasters will never be solved under the Yellows because they have not a single ideological framework for building the nation. What they do have in their minds is the continuing coddling of the local oligarchy and its foreign overlords; the continuing emaciation of the national economy by accumulating monopoly of its wealth and patrimony; the constant and systematic campaign to push back the Philippines into deeper and deeper social, economic, political, and moral regression until it is completely prostrate before the new, insidious total re-domination of the entire country; and a people completely defenseless and vulnerable to a final dissolution of their nation-state.

Come to think of it, the floods are the least of the disasters that have come from the Yellows. Their ultimate legacy to the future of this nation is the destruction of the nation's hopes — its last vestige of humanity.

(Watch Talk News TV with HTL, Saturdays, 8 to 9 p.m., with replay at 11:15 p.m. and Sundays, on GNN Destiny Cable Channel 8, this week on "Mines: Theirs or Ours?;" visit http://newkatipunan.blogspot.com)