DIE HARD III
Herman Tiu Laurel
3/14/2005
The “eminence gris” of Ramos, Joe Almonte spoke before the VAT-supporting Foundation for Economic Freedom forum. He described Philippine society as a “mismanaged society” and such ripe for coup d’etat. He referred to the Estrada administration that he said collapsed due to mismanagement; but for the short period of three years one wonders how the blame can be on Estrada. Estrada did not sign the IPP contracts making our power rates the highest in Asia today, nor all the loans that went to real estate ventures that have failed and ballooned with a vengeance.
One management ran the show since 1986, that’s the Edsa Uno cabal that includes the “eminence gris” and his boss but also Cory Aquino, the Makati Business Club, the “civil society” and its socio-cultural infrastructure embracing the mainstream media, the neo-liberal U.P. economists and the Foundation for Economic Freedom, the corrupt in the military and the police forces, among many others who have embraced the cult of power and profit over principle and truth. They have not only mismanaged what was once the envy of Asia, they also misled it for over a decade.
When the Filipino nation exercised its wisdom to break from mismanagement since 1986 and a new direction under Estrada, the Edsa Uno cabal plotted and organized Edsa Dos. They launched a coup d’etat despite the vote of almost 11-million Filipinos, the largest vote ever attained by a presidential candidate and the only undisputed electoral triumph since 1986 – a claim neither the disputed Cory Aquino and Ramos election can even pretend to assume, nor what Gloria can ever claim about her 2004 “victory” over FPJ which 75% of Filipinos doubt.
The “eminence gris” has neither “gris” matter nor eminence. Maybe the reason my repeated challenge to him to debate face-to-face on the issues he has never accepted. What he has contributed to the national debate is not intelligent discussion but pedantic and verbose psywar propaganda, lies intended to continuously mislead any segment of the public which can still be taken in by such Goebbelian trash. His main proposition at the FEF forum is BS: Purely military intervention has invariably plunged us from one frying pan to another until we end up in the fire.
One must speak of the mission and policies of management. Almonte has represented the faction in society that advocate globalization of the nation. That policy has clearly been debunked at the recent of the century, and ushering in bleak millennium prospects for the country. The Estrada administration was unwittingly challenging globalization by prioritizing food security, opposition to sovereign guarantees, resolution of the insurgency, among other policies that was achieving success. That success had to be aborted, hence Edsa Dos.
Edsa Dos brought on the nightmare of what should be called “the Gloria mismanagement”, now Ramos and his “eminence gris” are attempting to wash their hands of the guilt. But people know the truth; these stabs at the Gloria regime by Ramos and Almonte are to leverage with Gloria for concessions while confusing the public about the real solution. There is only one way to restore sound management, restore the Constitution and respect the people’s mandate to restore the basis of good management: Trust.
Gloria has put us in number 2 in corruption in Asia. The other frontrunners in the Asian corruption race have much higher GDP growth rates than the Philippines, even Indonesia which the latest report ranks as No. 1. A recent international article on Indonesia opines that it does better than the Philippines because Indonesia, like Vietnam, India and China, have strong nationalistic orientations. Speaking of corruption, what is the record of the Philippine administrations.
The corruption issue was used against Estrada, but after four years of pursing the corruption cases against Estrada not a single case has been proven. After Edsa Dos the Gloria government formed an investigation team to pursue alleged Estrada corruption cases, with then Justice Secretary Nani Perez heading the mission. But in time, it was Nani Perez who was felled by a major corruption case, the $ 2-M Impsa biribery scandal that even Hong Kong and Swiss financial authorities substantiated with documentary proofs. Up to this day, nothing on Estrada.
The result of the decade-and-a-half of the mismanagement of the Edsa Uno cabal, including their worse ever move creating Edsa Dos, is a nation in turmoil and on the brink of disaster. A “rumbling social volcano” is at our feet, and that is the topic today at the PUP’s Post Anniversary Convocation, sponsored by the PUP Department of Finance, Politics and Economics; Department of Mass Communication and Department of Arts and Letters. Speakers are: Mayor Jejomar Binay, Dr. Alejandro Lichauco, Atty. Alan Paguia, Mr. Hero Vaswani and yours truly.
Finally, take note of the cover story of one international magazine extolling Jeffrey Sachs and his solution to global poverty. Sachs was an exponent of the now failed globalization. They praise him for the “stabilization of the Bolivian currency”, but currency is not the economy. Look at the Bolivian economic collapse now. They give him credit for Poland “recovery”, but what Poland did was default on its debt forcing the West to give it 50% debt discount that had nothing to do with Sachs. Sachs’ “shock therapy” misled and looted Russia. Don’t be misled by these U.S. magazines.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Corpo-RAT-ocracy
DIE HARD III
Herman Tiu Laurel
2/14/2005
It’s a red-letter day today, but it’s not because of Valentines. It is bloody Monday after the 500% toll rates increases at the Nlex or North Luzon Expressway, almost literally bloody during the first days of implementation as some motorists flailed their tire wrenches at toll-gate keepers, forcing Nlex bosses to cancel the collection for a while. Let’s do something about this massive oppression and swindle of the Lopez corporations, with Christian Monsod’s International Finance Corporation behind it, and make begin a nationwide awakening to Corpo-RAT-ocracy’s oppression.
The term “corporatrocracy” we encountered in John Perkins book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” who said: “Tossing and turning in my bed, I found it impossible to deny that Charlie and everyone else on our team were here for selfish reasons. We were promoting U.S foreign policy and corporate interests. We were driven by greed… A word came to mind – corporatocracy. I was not sure whether I had heard it before or had just invented it, but it seemed to describe perfectly the new elite who had made up their minds to attempt to rule the planet.”
Perkins asserts, “Things are not as they appear. NBC is owned by General Electric…CNN is part of the huge AOL-Time Warner conglomerate. Most of our newspapers, magazines, and publishing houses are owned – and manipulated – by gigantic international corporations. Our media is part of the corporatocrcy…” and like them Philippine media is also controlled by the corporatocracy. Despite the media’s cover up the reality of the oppression by the corporate vampires is dawning on all Filipinos, thanks to their uncontrollable greed and undisguised abusiveness.
The emphasis on “RAT” is my contribution to Perkins’ new term corporatocracy because the “rats” behind these appear in public as respectable, very amiable and upright people. Take the people behind the Nlex company, the top honcho is the very “respectable” former Cory Aquino cabinet member Jose “Ping” de Jesus. With the Lopezes’ control of ABS-CBN and DZMM, and the regular Thursday morning coffee at Annabel’s paid for by Ping de Jesus through her PR men, the “rat” continues with a human face when appearing in public gatherings.
I have long known that in Ping de Jesus’s presentation of the Nlex project to the NEDA board for approval, an item in the alleged P 18.5-B cost of the Nlex improvements described P 700-M for “legal fees”. To the credit of Neda chair Romulo Neri, this item alarmed him enough to make him stand and ask how such a huge amount could be justified for “legal fees”. Jose “Ping” de Jesus reportedly replied, “The president knows about this already.” The almost respectable Neri just folded back and kept quiet to Ping de Jesus’ reply.
According to one congressman the Lopezes’ Nlex takeover of operations violates the franchise law. It does not allow transfer of a franchise, that was given to the PNCC. The Lopezes entered into joint venture with PNCC and used that to takeover the franchise, which is anomalous and illegal. The same congressman reminded me that this Nlex contract was “Bicol expressed” with supposedly P 1-M payola for each congressman but Albertito Lopez “kupit” from. It ended up as P 500K payolas that then Cong. Mike Defensor exposed.
A Makati executive opined that the 500% toll increase could be acceptable if the expressway expansion went all the way through to Pampangga and beyond, but it is only midway up to Bulacan. Improvements such as emergency phones and free towing to the nearest exit are just cosmetic, they haven’t even lighted up the stretch to Pampangga. These are common sense evaluation from common folks. No amount of justification by the First Philippine Industrial Development Corporation (FPIDC) will mitigate the rage their oppression and abuse has triggered.
Filipinos will be hard hit as passenger transporters, truckers and biyaheros are forced to add on this huge burden to their patrons. Vegetable prices used to pay more for the tong along the way to the expressways, now they say this toll cost more than all the tong the pay at the PNP checkpoints. We heard on radio that the truckers association is considering a blockade of the expressway. I hope they do and we in the people’s movement will go all out supporting them, or maybe the people’s movements should initiate it.
The people’s movements must consolidate their struggles. The corpo-rat-ocrats’ PR operators are having an easier time with the divided focus of people’s movements. The expanded-VAT issue, exponentially growing tax burdens, horrendous toll rates increases, bloating debt, increasing power and water rates all connect to one problem – the Corporatocracy or what I also call the corporate oligarchy. Look at the board of : Oscar Lopez, CEO; Augusto Almeda-Lopez, Abes, Garrucho, Hilado, Psinakis, Paterna, Sycip, etc. Didn’t all these support Gloria’s power grab and election cheating?
Psinakis was the Light-A-Fire and April 6 terrorist groups boss, are his puppets like Doris Baffrey and Boyette Montiel (with his laughable “anti-corruption” rally) still proud to serve this “rat”? Many now say Marcos was right after all to crush the Lopezes, but don’t forget American agent Sycip. Am I getting personal? But what could be more personally offensive than stealing from us face-to-face and in broad daylight? They eradicate Rats don’t they?
(For more, tune in from Mon. to Fri. on 1350AM, 7-8am on 1098AM, 6-7pm)
Herman Tiu Laurel
2/14/2005
It’s a red-letter day today, but it’s not because of Valentines. It is bloody Monday after the 500% toll rates increases at the Nlex or North Luzon Expressway, almost literally bloody during the first days of implementation as some motorists flailed their tire wrenches at toll-gate keepers, forcing Nlex bosses to cancel the collection for a while. Let’s do something about this massive oppression and swindle of the Lopez corporations, with Christian Monsod’s International Finance Corporation behind it, and make begin a nationwide awakening to Corpo-RAT-ocracy’s oppression.
The term “corporatrocracy” we encountered in John Perkins book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” who said: “Tossing and turning in my bed, I found it impossible to deny that Charlie and everyone else on our team were here for selfish reasons. We were promoting U.S foreign policy and corporate interests. We were driven by greed… A word came to mind – corporatocracy. I was not sure whether I had heard it before or had just invented it, but it seemed to describe perfectly the new elite who had made up their minds to attempt to rule the planet.”
Perkins asserts, “Things are not as they appear. NBC is owned by General Electric…CNN is part of the huge AOL-Time Warner conglomerate. Most of our newspapers, magazines, and publishing houses are owned – and manipulated – by gigantic international corporations. Our media is part of the corporatocrcy…” and like them Philippine media is also controlled by the corporatocracy. Despite the media’s cover up the reality of the oppression by the corporate vampires is dawning on all Filipinos, thanks to their uncontrollable greed and undisguised abusiveness.
The emphasis on “RAT” is my contribution to Perkins’ new term corporatocracy because the “rats” behind these appear in public as respectable, very amiable and upright people. Take the people behind the Nlex company, the top honcho is the very “respectable” former Cory Aquino cabinet member Jose “Ping” de Jesus. With the Lopezes’ control of ABS-CBN and DZMM, and the regular Thursday morning coffee at Annabel’s paid for by Ping de Jesus through her PR men, the “rat” continues with a human face when appearing in public gatherings.
I have long known that in Ping de Jesus’s presentation of the Nlex project to the NEDA board for approval, an item in the alleged P 18.5-B cost of the Nlex improvements described P 700-M for “legal fees”. To the credit of Neda chair Romulo Neri, this item alarmed him enough to make him stand and ask how such a huge amount could be justified for “legal fees”. Jose “Ping” de Jesus reportedly replied, “The president knows about this already.” The almost respectable Neri just folded back and kept quiet to Ping de Jesus’ reply.
According to one congressman the Lopezes’ Nlex takeover of operations violates the franchise law. It does not allow transfer of a franchise, that was given to the PNCC. The Lopezes entered into joint venture with PNCC and used that to takeover the franchise, which is anomalous and illegal. The same congressman reminded me that this Nlex contract was “Bicol expressed” with supposedly P 1-M payola for each congressman but Albertito Lopez “kupit” from. It ended up as P 500K payolas that then Cong. Mike Defensor exposed.
A Makati executive opined that the 500% toll increase could be acceptable if the expressway expansion went all the way through to Pampangga and beyond, but it is only midway up to Bulacan. Improvements such as emergency phones and free towing to the nearest exit are just cosmetic, they haven’t even lighted up the stretch to Pampangga. These are common sense evaluation from common folks. No amount of justification by the First Philippine Industrial Development Corporation (FPIDC) will mitigate the rage their oppression and abuse has triggered.
Filipinos will be hard hit as passenger transporters, truckers and biyaheros are forced to add on this huge burden to their patrons. Vegetable prices used to pay more for the tong along the way to the expressways, now they say this toll cost more than all the tong the pay at the PNP checkpoints. We heard on radio that the truckers association is considering a blockade of the expressway. I hope they do and we in the people’s movement will go all out supporting them, or maybe the people’s movements should initiate it.
The people’s movements must consolidate their struggles. The corpo-rat-ocrats’ PR operators are having an easier time with the divided focus of people’s movements. The expanded-VAT issue, exponentially growing tax burdens, horrendous toll rates increases, bloating debt, increasing power and water rates all connect to one problem – the Corporatocracy or what I also call the corporate oligarchy. Look at the board of : Oscar Lopez, CEO; Augusto Almeda-Lopez, Abes, Garrucho, Hilado, Psinakis, Paterna, Sycip, etc. Didn’t all these support Gloria’s power grab and election cheating?
Psinakis was the Light-A-Fire and April 6 terrorist groups boss, are his puppets like Doris Baffrey and Boyette Montiel (with his laughable “anti-corruption” rally) still proud to serve this “rat”? Many now say Marcos was right after all to crush the Lopezes, but don’t forget American agent Sycip. Am I getting personal? But what could be more personally offensive than stealing from us face-to-face and in broad daylight? They eradicate Rats don’t they?
(For more, tune in from Mon. to Fri. on 1350AM, 7-8am on 1098AM, 6-7pm)
Friday, March 4, 2011
Neither Singapore nor Libya
DIE HARD III
Herman Tiu Laurel
3/4/2011
If Marcos had not been forced out of the country and continued to govern, would the Philippines be a Singapore today as Sen. Bongbong Marcos claims? Or would it be, as Aquino III countered, a Libya wracked by internal strife with thousands dead and an uncertain future?
I discussed this recently on my Global News Network cable show with UP Solair (School of Labor and Industrial Relations) economics professor Dr. Rene Ofreneo, Manila Standard columnist and author Rod Kapunan, and the Fertilizer Industry Association of the Philippines’ past president, Jun Aristorenas.
With our topic, “RP Economics: From Marcos to the Present,” we got to review 21 years of Marcos and 25 years of the Yellow movement’s control of the direction of this country; and there was only one common conclusion. It’s definitely something that will make Cory Aquino turn in her grave while Ferdinand Marcos and his Agriculture Secretary Bong Tangco smile from wherever they are.
Ofreneo’s historical account of the Marcos period divides it into two — the first half in the early ’70s marked by Marcos’ acquiescence to the IMF-WB economic prescriptions and the second half, as the ’80s began, with Marcos launching the “11 Industrial Projects” that would have made the Philippines among the first Tiger Economies in Asean.
Kapunan puts the thrust toward industrialization under Marcos earlier, as early as the mid-70s. He took the view that if Marcos had continued on, the Philippines today would not be a Singapore, which developed more as a trading and financial entrepôt, but more like South Korea, with heavy industries such as steel, petrochemicals, automotive manufacturing, and the like.
Aristorenas, who started his career in 1976 with the Department of Agriculture under Bong Tangco, described the Marcos-Tangco vision as “25 years into the future,” with the domestic fertilizer industry in partnership with the Republic of Nauru as a base to become a food production powerhouse.
Reviewing 46 years of economic history is surprisingly easy; hindsight allows us an easy view of the essential issues. Ofreneo said that the Marcos regime’s epiphany as a National Economic Development advocate and leader came with Marcos’ landmark book, Revolution from the Center. Co-written with nationalist intellectuals, it really had the Japanese “Meiji Restoration” and its crash agro-industrialization program in mind. This paradigm, Ofreneo said, is the same that China has adopted, propelling it to its status today as an economic superpower — the same path being taken by Vietnam.
Of course, all the other Tiger Economies used the same paradigm, all following Marcos’ lead. The only tragedy, Ofreneo asserts, is that by 1981, Marcos accommodated the IMF-WB prescriptions (under the Structural Adjustment Program) and accepted “neo-liberal, free trade” with Cesar Virata and Gerry Sicat as economic managers, which actions led to the scuttling of his agro-industrialization program.
After the fall of Marcos, Ofreneo lamented, agro-industrialization was completely supplanted by neo-liberalism. Thereafter, the industrial projects were privatized or completely abandoned. The national steel company went to seed, its equipment looted, its viability undermined by the “highest electricity cost in Asia,” with the Indian company that runs it today suspected of using it only as a front for dumping steel products.
PhilPhos, the Marcos-era state fertilizer company, used to provide chemical and organic fertilizers at very low cost, helping the country achieve rice self-sufficiency and export capability throughout the late ’70s and ’80s; but now, the Philippines is dependent on both fertilizer and rice imports.
Other projects such as car manufacturing, Kapunan pointed out, provided economic multiplier effects such as production of radiators, automotive glass, rubber seals, car seats and upholstery. All these provided thousands of jobs which have all been lost today.
There was very little to discuss about Cory Aquino or Yellow-era economics, evincing the fact that there’s really very little or no economic initiative that can be attributed to it. Indeed, everything that happened after Cory assumed power seems to have emanated from the IMF-WB.
Liberalization, privatization and deregulation have been the rule since — accentuated even further by the Fidel Ramos and Gloria Arroyo regimes. The results have been tragic — food import dependency, de-industrialization, jobless growth, the decline of the middle class, growing poverty and hunger, ad nausea.
When I brought up the debt issue relative to the capital needed to restart economic development, Ofreneo cited the 2002 debt default of the late Nestor Kirchner of Argentina, who got an 80-percent discount on the country’s debts, allowing it to achieve “one of the highest growth rates today not only in Latin America but the world.” So, obviously, my last question was: Is it too late to restart RP’s economic renaissance?
Ofreneo, in a tangential reference to the OFW evacuation crisis in the Middle East, rhetorically asked, “Where’s the evacuation plan for the economy?” When I asked if Aquino III has the capability to solve the crisis, Ofreneo only had this to say: “He has to if he is to survive.” But then, Kapunan doesn’t believe Aquino III will survive. And even as Aristorenas said it may no longer be possible to compete with China’s very cheap fertilizers, still, he said, Filipino farmers must be supported with micro-financing and price subsidies, just as Japan, South Korea, and many countries are doing.
My conclusion is that the Philippines would neither have become a Singapore nor a Libya (since Marcos had already vanquished the Moro National Liberation Front and the New People’s Army, with Nur and Joma exiled); nor a copycat of South Korea. And since no one really has a copyright on good ideas, Aquino III might as well adopt Marcos’ “Revolution from the Center” and forge the path toward a Greater Philippines.
(Tune in to Sulo ng Pilipino, Monday, Wednesday and Friday, 6 to 7 p.m. on 1098AM; TNT with HTL, Tuesday, 8 to 9 p.m., with replay at 11 p.m., on GNN, Destiny Cable Channel 8, on “Reviewing the Marcos Path;” visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com for our select radio and GNN shows)
Herman Tiu Laurel
3/4/2011
If Marcos had not been forced out of the country and continued to govern, would the Philippines be a Singapore today as Sen. Bongbong Marcos claims? Or would it be, as Aquino III countered, a Libya wracked by internal strife with thousands dead and an uncertain future?
I discussed this recently on my Global News Network cable show with UP Solair (School of Labor and Industrial Relations) economics professor Dr. Rene Ofreneo, Manila Standard columnist and author Rod Kapunan, and the Fertilizer Industry Association of the Philippines’ past president, Jun Aristorenas.
With our topic, “RP Economics: From Marcos to the Present,” we got to review 21 years of Marcos and 25 years of the Yellow movement’s control of the direction of this country; and there was only one common conclusion. It’s definitely something that will make Cory Aquino turn in her grave while Ferdinand Marcos and his Agriculture Secretary Bong Tangco smile from wherever they are.
Ofreneo’s historical account of the Marcos period divides it into two — the first half in the early ’70s marked by Marcos’ acquiescence to the IMF-WB economic prescriptions and the second half, as the ’80s began, with Marcos launching the “11 Industrial Projects” that would have made the Philippines among the first Tiger Economies in Asean.
Kapunan puts the thrust toward industrialization under Marcos earlier, as early as the mid-70s. He took the view that if Marcos had continued on, the Philippines today would not be a Singapore, which developed more as a trading and financial entrepôt, but more like South Korea, with heavy industries such as steel, petrochemicals, automotive manufacturing, and the like.
Aristorenas, who started his career in 1976 with the Department of Agriculture under Bong Tangco, described the Marcos-Tangco vision as “25 years into the future,” with the domestic fertilizer industry in partnership with the Republic of Nauru as a base to become a food production powerhouse.
Reviewing 46 years of economic history is surprisingly easy; hindsight allows us an easy view of the essential issues. Ofreneo said that the Marcos regime’s epiphany as a National Economic Development advocate and leader came with Marcos’ landmark book, Revolution from the Center. Co-written with nationalist intellectuals, it really had the Japanese “Meiji Restoration” and its crash agro-industrialization program in mind. This paradigm, Ofreneo said, is the same that China has adopted, propelling it to its status today as an economic superpower — the same path being taken by Vietnam.
Of course, all the other Tiger Economies used the same paradigm, all following Marcos’ lead. The only tragedy, Ofreneo asserts, is that by 1981, Marcos accommodated the IMF-WB prescriptions (under the Structural Adjustment Program) and accepted “neo-liberal, free trade” with Cesar Virata and Gerry Sicat as economic managers, which actions led to the scuttling of his agro-industrialization program.
After the fall of Marcos, Ofreneo lamented, agro-industrialization was completely supplanted by neo-liberalism. Thereafter, the industrial projects were privatized or completely abandoned. The national steel company went to seed, its equipment looted, its viability undermined by the “highest electricity cost in Asia,” with the Indian company that runs it today suspected of using it only as a front for dumping steel products.
PhilPhos, the Marcos-era state fertilizer company, used to provide chemical and organic fertilizers at very low cost, helping the country achieve rice self-sufficiency and export capability throughout the late ’70s and ’80s; but now, the Philippines is dependent on both fertilizer and rice imports.
Other projects such as car manufacturing, Kapunan pointed out, provided economic multiplier effects such as production of radiators, automotive glass, rubber seals, car seats and upholstery. All these provided thousands of jobs which have all been lost today.
There was very little to discuss about Cory Aquino or Yellow-era economics, evincing the fact that there’s really very little or no economic initiative that can be attributed to it. Indeed, everything that happened after Cory assumed power seems to have emanated from the IMF-WB.
Liberalization, privatization and deregulation have been the rule since — accentuated even further by the Fidel Ramos and Gloria Arroyo regimes. The results have been tragic — food import dependency, de-industrialization, jobless growth, the decline of the middle class, growing poverty and hunger, ad nausea.
When I brought up the debt issue relative to the capital needed to restart economic development, Ofreneo cited the 2002 debt default of the late Nestor Kirchner of Argentina, who got an 80-percent discount on the country’s debts, allowing it to achieve “one of the highest growth rates today not only in Latin America but the world.” So, obviously, my last question was: Is it too late to restart RP’s economic renaissance?
Ofreneo, in a tangential reference to the OFW evacuation crisis in the Middle East, rhetorically asked, “Where’s the evacuation plan for the economy?” When I asked if Aquino III has the capability to solve the crisis, Ofreneo only had this to say: “He has to if he is to survive.” But then, Kapunan doesn’t believe Aquino III will survive. And even as Aristorenas said it may no longer be possible to compete with China’s very cheap fertilizers, still, he said, Filipino farmers must be supported with micro-financing and price subsidies, just as Japan, South Korea, and many countries are doing.
My conclusion is that the Philippines would neither have become a Singapore nor a Libya (since Marcos had already vanquished the Moro National Liberation Front and the New People’s Army, with Nur and Joma exiled); nor a copycat of South Korea. And since no one really has a copyright on good ideas, Aquino III might as well adopt Marcos’ “Revolution from the Center” and forge the path toward a Greater Philippines.
(Tune in to Sulo ng Pilipino, Monday, Wednesday and Friday, 6 to 7 p.m. on 1098AM; TNT with HTL, Tuesday, 8 to 9 p.m., with replay at 11 p.m., on GNN, Destiny Cable Channel 8, on “Reviewing the Marcos Path;” visit http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com for our select radio and GNN shows)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
